The Guardian view on Syria, the ceasefire and the aid convoy attack: a new low
Editorial
fter so many atrocities, it is hard to be as shocked as one should be by the horrors of the war in Syria. Appalled, yes. But surprise is harder to muster. Week after week and month after month, the crimes mount up. Civilians have been attacked with chemical weapons and have learned to fear the roar of government forces’ helicopters bearing barrel bombs, and the deployment of “hell cannons” by rebels. Medical facilities have repeatedly been targeted. The limp body of Alan Kurdi and the dazed, dusty face of OmranDaqneesh have forced us all to recognise again and again that no one is protected from this war.
Syria is not the first place where besieged families have faced starvation, but their suffering has been extraordinarily protracted. Five years of civil war has killed half a million citizens and displaced millions more.
Even so, Monday’s
airstrike on a UN aid convoy delivering food to a rebel-held area close to Aleppo was another low. This was not only a humanitarian initiative but one that had been agreed by all parties. The convoy was clearly marked, had the necessary permits, and had notified everyone who needed to know of its passage. If the attack was deliberate – and it is hard to believe otherwise – it was a war crime.
Government forces have spent months blocking aid deliveries to besieged civilians and stripping those that did get through of essential medical supplies. It appears that the prospect of some relief at last for rebel areas could not be tolerated, whatever promises had been made. The regime perhaps felt it enjoyed a degree of cover too due to the deaths of 62 government soldiers
in a US airstrike at the weekend – “on purpose and planned in advance”, the government claimed. But above all, it appears that the Syrian regime now enjoys a sense of utter impunity. It has nothing and no one to fear. Neither Bashar al-Assad nor his forces have any reason to believe they will be held to account for their actions.
They are not the only ones to blame. As Ban Ki-moon warned in his final address to the UN general assembly as secretary general, powerful patrons on both sides have blood on their hands. He was pointed, too, in his references to
countries exercising vetoes and
“hold[ing] the world hostage on so many important issues”. Russia’s role in Syria was underscored by the remarkable, almost smirking pronouncement from its defence ministry that there was no evidence of an attack and the convoy had simply caught fire – even if that was not a line that its foreign minister could or did maintain in talks with the US.
The attack appeared to sound the death knell for a ceasefire that was painfully reached and had been greeted only tentatively as a potential step forward. Not dead, insisted the main players, only in danger. But after Monday’s attack, it is hard to regard a ceasefire as a meaningful concept in Syria. No one can feel enthusiastic about attempts to revive it; nor will anyone be keen to test its parameters by attempting another aid delivery. Yet as Boris Johnson warned on Tuesday, negotiations between US secretary of state John Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov are the only game in town. Barack Obama, who once spoke boldly of red lines on chemical weapons use, can now only reiterate calls for “hard diplomacy”. With the president on his way out, the US has even less leverage over Moscow; its best hope is that
Russia might be more concerned about negotiating with a Hillary Clinton administration.
In the meantime, the west can at least do something for those who have escaped the conflict, both by supporting the countries that have accepted the vast bulk of refugees and by welcoming individuals. Britain’s record in this regard is particularly poor; so far it has
taken in fewer than 3,000 of the 20,000 Syrians who have been promised resettlement over the next four years. This weekend Theresa May
resisted calls to improve on that meagre offer.
Equally important is a commitment to hold the Syrian government to account for its actions one day. It should not believe that the licence it enjoys now will be extended to it permanently. No one should be able to mount attacks like Monday’s so casually. The
Commission for International Justice and Accountability has already begun collecting material on the Assad regime’s actions with a view to potential prosecutions. It deserves support, not only because Syrians deserve justice, but to protect civilians in future conflicts. If war crimes cannot be prevented, they must be punished.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/20/the-guardian-view-on-syria-the-ceasefire-and-the-aid-convoy-attack-a-new-low