ـ |
ـ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
مواجهة
العنف في أمريكا بقلم:
جوناثان زيمرمان كريستيان
ساينس مونيتور - 18/4/2007 في
أعقاب حادثة إطلاق النار في
فرجينينا, فان أمريكا بحاجة إلى
يوم للحداد ويوم للتفكير Facing
up to violence in America In
the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, By
Jonathan Zimmerman But
I wasn't shocked. Upset, yes – but not shocked. And
that should shock all of us. We
have been here before, of course. The sites of prior
school massacres are etched on our minds, a symbolic
shorthand for the violence and malevolence that none of
us can comprehend. So
it's hard to be shocked when you see it all again,
unfolding in real time on television and the Internet.
And it's hard to avoid the same facile questions – and
the same superficial answers – that followed the other
tragedies. Whenever
something like this happens, of course, everyone wants
to know why. So they seize upon the particulars of the
case, probing the killers' backgrounds and psyches: this
one was bullied, that one used drugs, and so on. Or they
make enormous generalizations about American culture, to
suggest that we're all going to hell in a handbasket. In
the wake of Columbine, for example, prominent
conservative Tom DeLay linked youth violence with the
teaching of evolution in schools and "working
mothers who take birth control pills." No less
absurdly, some commentators tried to make violent video
games the culprit, as if playing a few rounds of Grand
Theft Auto makes you shoot up a school. It's
hard to know why a specific killer acted in the way he
did. Rather than focusing narrowly upon this awful
event, then, we should declare a National Day of
Mourning and Reflection on Violence in Why,
we should ask, are the gunmen in school massacres almost
always male? What does that tell us about the ways we
socialize boys in Second,
why are most of these gunmen also white? (Yes, reports
indicate the Virginia Tech gunman was Asian; but almost
every other mass shooter has been white.) Black and
Latino boys commit plenty of violence in school, of
course, but they're more likely to assault an individual
whom they know. White shooters more often kill en masse
and randomly: They're aiming for high body counts, not
for a particular target. Why? Third,
why do so many American men – and, increasingly, many
American women – own guns? Between 40 percent and 50
percent of American households own a gun, one of the
highest percentages in the Western world. We can and
should debate the best ways to regulate guns, but we
simply cannot deny their prevalence in our society. And
even though Virginia Tech was nominally a "gun-free
zone," the shooter had no trouble bringing weapons
there. Why do so many Americans own guns? Which
Americans choose to purchase them? And how do guns
influence the nature of violence in Fourth,
what messages do our various mass media transmit about
men, women, and violence? In the recent imbroglio over
racist comments by Don Imus, many commentators observed
– correctly – that similarly bigoted language
suffuses Last,
and most important, what can we do to change? How, as a
nation, can we become less violent? Is it even possible?
I'd
like to say it is, because I believe deeply in our
nation's potential for renewal and transformation. But
in darker moments, I'm not so sure. And,
surely, the Virginia Tech massacre is one of the darkest
moments of all. That's precisely why we need to shed
light, right now, upon the larger patterns of violence
that surround us. We must transcend the particulars of
this awful event so that we can see it in its wider
national context. And we must not look away. So
I propose this Thursday, April 19, as National Day of
Mourning and Reflection on Violence in
•
Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0418/p09s02-coop.html?page=2 ----------------- نشرنا
لهذه المقالات لا يعني أنها
تعبر عن وجهة نظر المركز كلياً
أو جزئياً
|
ـ |
ـ |
من حق الزائر الكريم أن ينقل وأن ينشر كل ما يعجبه من موقعنا . معزواً إلينا ، أو غير معزو .ـ |