الإسلام
و الرئاسة في تركيا
بقلم:
أندرو بورفيس
مجلة
التايم الامريكية - 25/4/2007
Islam
and the Presidency in Turkey
Wednesday, Apr. 25, 2007
By
ANDREW
PURVIS
In
Turkey
,
the choosing of a president is rarely the dramatic
affair that it is in the
United States
.
Turkey
's
president isn't even directly elected by the voters —
he or she is chosen by the elected parliament — and
the office carries limited powers. Still, the president
does have the power to veto legislation, and is also
considered an important symbol of the Turkish state.
That's why the nomination for president this week by
Turkey's ruling party of the country's Foreign Minister,
Abdullah Gul, has reopened fierce debates about the
place of Islam in the ferociously secular Turkish state.
Gul,
54, is an affable moderate and one of friendliest faces
of the political party that has dominated
Turkey
's
parliament for the past five years. But like most senior
officials of his Justice and Development Party, or AKP,
his roots are in an Islamic grouping that was banned in
Turkey
in the 1990s. His Arabic is better than his English, as
secular Turks like to point out. And his wife wears a
traditional Islamic headscarf. (In fact, she petitioned
the European Court of Human Rights to declare
unconstitutional
Turkey
's
law banning headscarves in public buildings, although
she later dropped the case.) If her husband is
confirmed, Mrs. Gul would be the only Turkish First Lady
ever to cover her hair in this way. By contrast, the
incumbent, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, a former judge
and staunch secularist, has routinely wielded his veto
to block AKP initiatives he deemed too Islamist.
Gul's
election — parliament is to vote for a president in
the coming weeks — would also give the ruling AKP
control of
Turkey
's
three top political posts: the Presidency, the Prime
Minister's office and the Speaker of the Parliament. (In
parliamentary elections later this year , the AKP is
expected to be returned to power, albeit with a reduced
mandate). The election to all three top positions of
officials who "come from the same Islamic-rooted
tree," writes columnist Metin Munir in the leading
secularist daily Milliyet, augurs "the end of
Turkey
as we know it. "
Turkey
,
he warned, is about to enter "a period of
Islamicizing and conservatism: It is hard to tell where
it will end."
Such
fears may be exaggerated, however, since
Turkey
's
institutions have potent safeguards against the
introduction of political Islam. And the powerful
Turkish military, self-appointed guardians of the
secularist state, stands ready to intervene should those
safeguards be breached. (It did so a decade ago by
removing Gul's former party from government.) The AKP
has so far been reluctant to introduce any changes that
might provoke the wrath of the generals. At a rare press
conference prior to this week's nomination of Gul, the
hawkish army chief Yasar Buyukanit warned that a Turkish
President must have secular values, "not only in
words, but in essence."
The
secularist backlash has already made itself felt: Gul is
his party's second choice for president; for several
months it has been assumed that the AKP's nomination
would go to current Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, whose Islamist roots are more pronounced than
Gul's, and who is widely distrusted by the Turkish
military and secular establishment. At a huge secularist
rally last weekend in
Ankara
, at least 300,000 people
turned out to oppose Erdogan's candidacy, some saying
they would prefer military rule to him being president.
The AKP appears to have noted the warning.
Gul's
selection removes a key institutional check on his
party's agenda, which is likely to increase friction
with the military. The choice also represents a broader
shift in political power away from the secularist elite
in
Turkey
's
coastal cities and towards the conservative Islamic
heartland. Gul himself hails from
Central Anatolia
,
the Turkish equivalent of
America
's
Bible Belt. His party's ascendance over the past five
years poses a clear challenge not only to the military,
but to
Turkey
's
old secular establishment. It's a challenge based on a
democratic mandate from the electorate. But in a country
where the military retains an implicit veto over the
actions of the democratically elected politicians, it
remains to be seen how far the balance will be tipped.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1614708,00.html
-----------------
نشرنا
لهذه المقالات لا يعني أنها
تعبر عن وجهة نظر المركز كلياً
أو جزئياً
|