ـ |
ـ |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
السلام
أقل كلفة بقلم:
نيهيميا شتراسلر هاآرتز
- 30/6/2007 لم يعد بمقدورنا أن نلوح براية
الدفاع في نفس الوقت الذي نلوح
فيه بالراية الاقتصادية-الاجتماعية Peace
is cheaper By
Nehemia Shtrasler It
is not clear whether the Sharm el-Sheikh summit actually
accomplished anything. True, Ehud Olmert spoke
eloquently about his desire for peace and his commitment
to resolving the conflict with the Palestinians, but we
have all had our fill of speeches and promises. On the
other hand, Olmert returned from the United States a few
days ago with something tangible in hand - a $600
million addition to the defense budget. When the two met
privately, President George W. Bush promised to increase
the U.S. defense grant to $3 billion a year beginning in
2009. Olmert
takes credit for this, of course. He believes it is
related to his warm relationship with Bush. But the
truth is that, with or without Olmert, Bush is a staunch
supporter of Israel. He regards Israel as a stable
island of democracy in a sea of Arab dictatorships and a
rescue team that will always be beside him in his global
war on Islamic fundamentalism. In
this private tete-a-tete, Olmert told Bush about
Israel's defense problems, which are far from simple. It
turns out that since October 2000, the outbreak of the
second intifada, the defense situation has changed in a
very fundamental way. Israel is fighting simultaneously
on four fronts, and the financial burden is unbearable.
Since the intifada, the outlay on the Palestinian
conflict has risen steeply. There is always something
else: In 2001-2003, the GNP dropped sharply generating
losses of 50 billion shekels; then came the construction
of the wall, then special operations like Defensive
Shield, then disengagement from Gaza, with total costs
reaching NIS 10 billion. The conflict with the
Palestinians has pushed Israel into an insane arms race
in which the country is forking out mind-boggling sums
while the Palestinians spend almost nothing. Consider
the tunnels. The Palestinians dig them with shovels, and
Israel invests a fortune in electronic systems to track
them down. Consider the Qassams. The Palestinians launch
crude metal pipes filled with explosives using a simple
firing mechanism, which sets them back $300 a Qassam,
while Israel develops a super sophisticated anti-missile
system to shoot down these flying pipes at the cost of
$100,000 per Qassam. Add to that the cost of upgrading
shelters in Sderot and the settlements around Gaza. Need
another example? In order to keep out suicide bombers,
Israel has spent the gargantuan sum of NIS 13 billion to
build a security fence around the West Bank. And
all this is nothing compared to the sums spent on
preparations to ward off the two conventional threats
posed by Hezbollah and Syria, and the unconventional
threat posed by Iran. The budgets required in each case
beggar belief. Hearing
this, Bush quickly put his hand in his pocket and pulled
out a bundle. But he needs to know that even another
$600 million a year is not enough. Israel cannot juggle
all these dangers simultaneously and also continue to
invest in the economy and address the country's social
ills − fighting poverty, reducing socioeconomic
gaps, improving education and expanding the health
basket. In
recent years, we have closed our eyes to this grim state
of affairs. We thought we could turn the Israel Defense
Forces into a contractor for policing the territories
without having to train soldiers, either regular troops
and reserve units, for the possibility of real war. The
army also thought it could postpone replacing equipment
and military gear. It was notoriously lax in the upkeep
of its armored personnel carriers and tanks. The
consequences were evident in the bitter fiasco of the
Second Lebanon War. Bearing
all this in mind, Olmert has a critical mission before
him: to whittle down the number of threats facing
Israel. From his promises to Palestinian Authority
Chairman Mahmoud Abbas at Sharm el-Sheikh, and his
impassioned call upon the Arab countries to sit down and
talk peace, Olmert is showing that the penny has
dropped: We can no longer wave the defense banner and
the socioeconomic banner at one and the same time. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/876396.html ----------------- نشرنا
لهذه المقالات لا يعني أنها
تعبر عن وجهة نظر المركز كلياً
أو جزئياً
|
ـ |
ـ |
من حق الزائر الكريم أن ينقل وأن ينشر كل ما يعجبه من موقعنا . معزواً إلينا ، أو غير معزو .ـ |