النفاق
في الشرق الأوسط
بقلم:
رون باول – نائب عن تكساس في
الكونغرس الأمريكي
فري
لايبرال (الليبرالي الحر)
الأمريكية
مجلة - 2/3/2007
Hypocrisy
in the Middle East
by Ron Paul
Hundreds of thousands of American troops already occupy
Afghanistan
and
Iraq
, a number that is rising as the military surge moves forward. The
justification, given endlessly since September 11th, is
that both support terrorism and thus pose a risk to the
United States
. Yet when we step back and examine the region as a whole,
it’s obvious that these two impoverished countries,
neither of which has any real military, pose very little
threat to American national security when compared to
other Middle Eastern nations. The decision to attack
them, while treating some of region’s worst regimes as
allies, shows the deadly hypocrisy of our foreign policy
in the
Middle
East
.
Consider
Saudi Arabia
, the native home of most of the September 11th hijackers. The Saudis,
unlike the Iraqis, have proven connections to al Qaeda.
Saudi charities have funneled money to Islamic terrorist
groups. Yet the administration insists on calling
Saudi
Arabia
a “good partner in the war on terror.” Why? Because
the
U.S.
has a longstanding relationship with the Saudi royal
family, and a long history of commercial interests
relating to Saudi oil. So successive administrations
continue to treat the Saudis as something they are not:
a reliable and honest friend in the
Middle East
.
The same is true of
Pakistan
, where General Musharaf seized power by force in a 1999 coup. The
Clinton
administration quickly accepted his new leadership as legitimate, to the
dismay of
India
and many Muslim Pakistanis. Since 9/11, we have showered
Pakistan
with millions in foreign aid, ostensibly in exchange for
Musharaf’s allegiance against al Qaeda. Yet has our
new ally rewarded our support? Hardly. The Pakistanis
almost certainly have harbored bin Laden in their remote
mountains, and show little interest in pursuing him or
allowing anyone else to pursue him.
Pakistan
has signed peace agreements with Taliban leaders, and by some accounts bin
Laden is a folk hero to many Pakistanis.
Furthermore, more members of al Qaeda probably live within
Pakistan
than any other country today.
North Korea
developed its nuclear capability with technology sold to
them by the Pakistanis. Yet somehow we remain friends
with
Pakistan
, while Saddam Hussein, who had no connection to bin Laden
and no friends in the Islamic fundamentalist world, was
made a scapegoat.
The tired assertion that
America
"supports democracy" in the
Middle East
is increasingly transparent. It was false 50 years ago, when we supported
and funded the hated Shah of Iran to prevent
nationalization of Iranian oil, and it’s false today
when we back an unelected military dictator in
Pakistan-
just to name two examples. If honest democratic elections
were held throughout the
Middle East
tomorrow, many countries would elect religious
fundamentalist leaders hostile to the
United States
. Cliché or not, the Arab Street really doesn’t like
America, so we should stop the charade about democracy
and start pursuing a coherent foreign policy that serves
America’s long-term interests.
A coherent foreign policy is based on the understanding that
America
is best served by not interfering in the deadly conflicts
that define the
Middle
East
. Yes, we need Middle
Eastern oil, but we can reduce our need by exploring
domestic sources. We should rid ourselves of the notion
that we are at the mercy of the oil-producing countries-
as the world’s largest oil consumer, their wealth
depends on our business. We should stop the endless game
of playing faction against faction, and recognize that
buying allies doesn’t work. We should curtail the
heavy militarization of the area by ending our
disastrous foreign aid payments. We should stop propping
up dictators and putting band-aids on festering
problems. We should understand that our political and
military involvement in the region creates far more
problems that it solves. All Americans will benefit,
both in terms of their safety and their pocketbooks, if
we pursue a coherent, neutral foreign policy of
non-interventionism, free trade, and self-determination
in the
Middle East
.
Dr.
Ron Paul is a Republican congressman from
Texas
.
http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/002645.html
-----------------
نشرنا
لهذه المقالات لا يعني أنها
تعبر عن وجهة نظر المركز كلياً
أو جزئياً
|